A FREE gift for you!

• Passage outline in English and Greek.
• 4 lines of evidence for this passage's antiquity.
• 4 arguments for this passage containing eyewitness testimony.
• 15 quotes from professionals in the field attesting to this passage's antiquity.
• And MORE!

Jesus' life, burial, empty tomb, the disciples experience of the risen Jesus, Paul's conversion, and James' conversion. These six facts have far-reaching implications. And they are historically well-evidenced.

With a comprehensive back-end and a carefully curated front end, you'll be able to learn and present the information with no added stress. 

Between the Hebrew and Christian Scriptures, and the Intertestamental writings, Jews had a lot to say about resurrection. Their beliefs make Jesus' resurrection an unlikely invention.

Everything from the Synoptic Problem, to the so-called "Q" source, to the pre-Markan passion narrative. We don't treat the gospels as inerrant. We treat them as historical documents.

Paul wrote his letters before the Gospels were written. But there are sources even earlier than Paul's writtings, and they talk specifically about Jesus' burial and resurrection!

Between Josephus, the Mishnah, the New Testament, and even some Roman sources (not to mention the archeological remains), we have a pretty good idea of what burial looked like for crucified victims.

Gone are the days of influencing culture by merely quoting the Bible. 

The West has seen a gradual shift toward secularism for centuries, but you already know that.

We no longer live in an "Acts 2 world."

Peter's good ol' Gospel preaching was effective with his audience. 

(3,000 conversions successful!) 

Now contrast Peter in Acts 2 with Paul in Acts 17. From thousands to a mere handful. 

What was different? 

NOT the oration skills of the speaker.

NOT the message. 

The AUDIENCE.

Peter spoke to Bible-believing Jews. Paul spoke to pagan Gentiles. 

Peter quoted one scripture after another. Paul quoted no scripture, and instead opted to quote from a Greek poet.

Paul appealed to the truth of Christianity on the basis of the culture's own sources of authority. 

Here's the kicker:

Young people in our churches are far closer to an Acts 17 audience, yet we're still using Acts 2 strategies. 

You already know this.

This course uses the best of our culture's accepted sources of authority to make a case for the truth of Jesus' resurrection. 

This isn't basic stuff like "Pliny the Younger proves that Jesus existed" or "Tacitus proves that Jesus was crucified."   

No.

This course takes you into the details of historical argumentation. 

Historians don't use Tacitus to learn about Jesus. They use Paul and the Gospels.

But they don't use these documents as Scripture. They use them as historical sources.

And when you use these sources as historical documents, I'll show you how you can still get to Jesus' resurrection. 

So, are you ready to gain expertise in order to strengthen your faith and teach others?

No Risk. Guaranteed.

Try the course for 30 days, and if you're not
completely satisfied, your money will be refunded
right away, 100%, no questions asked
(and no hard feelings). 

What do you have to lose?